中文内容由 Google Cloud Translation 自动生成，仅供参考；请以英文原文为准。问答资料来自欧盟化学品管理局（ECHA）官方网站。
答案（中文）
无论采用何种分类原则，都应根据具体情况，对气雾剂分配器中的混合物进行如下健康和环境影响分类。如果添加的推进剂或其他气体：1) 喷洒时不释放，则在对气雾剂分配器中的混合物进行分类时不应考虑它；2) 喷洒时部分或全部释放，但与混合物的其他成分分离，则在对与其分离的气雾剂分配器中的混合物进行分类时也不应考虑它。当推进剂或其他气体部分或全部释放时，如果推进剂或其他气体未液化，或者已液化且蒸气压 (20°C) ≥ 10 kPa，则通常假定推进剂或其他气体与混合物的其他成分分离。3) 喷洒时部分或全部释放，且未与混合物的其他成分分离，则在对气雾剂分配器中的混合物进行分类时应考虑它。如果推进剂是液体并且其蒸汽压（20°C）低于 10kPa，则默认适用第三种情况，因为通常可以假定推进剂或其他气体不会与混合物的其他成分分离。如果有正当理由证明没有发生分离，或者由于其他原因，根据 CLP 法规第 6(1) 条的规定，对投放市场的气雾剂分配器的全部内容进行分类更为“相关”，则可以适用第三种情况。对于上述第一种和第二种情况，如果推进剂或其他气体本身被归类为对健康或环境有害，则该分类应反映在气雾剂分配器的标签上。
Answer (EN)
Regardless of the classification principle applied, mixtures in aerosol dispensers should be classified for health and environmental effects as follows, depending on the case.
If the added propellant or other gas:
1) is not released upon spraying, it should not be taken into account for the classification of the mixture in the aerosol dispenser
2) is partially or fully released upon spraying, but is separated from the other constituents of the mixture, it should also not be taken into account for the classification of the mixture in the aerosol dispenser from which it is separated. Where the propellant or other gas is partially or fully released, the propellant or other gas is generally assumed to be separated from the other constituents of the mixture if the propellant or other gas either is not liquefied or it is liquefied and has a vapour pressure (20°C) ≥ 10 kPa.
3) is partially or fully released upon spraying and is not separated from the other constituents of the mixture, it should be taken into account for the classification of the mixture in the aerosol dispenser. This third case applies by default if the propellant is a liquid and has a vapour pressure (20°C) below 10kPa, since it can then be generally assumed that the propellant or other gas does not separate from the other constituents of the mixture.
If it can be duly justified either that no separation takes place, or that classification of the entire contents of the aerosol dispenser as placed on the market is more ‘relevant’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of the CLP Regulation for some other reason, then the third case can be applied.
For cases one and two above, if the propellant or other gas itself is classified as hazardous for health or the environment, that classification should be reflected in the label of the aerosol dispenser.