CLP 第 37(6) 条是否适用于拥有信息而有义务偏离附件 VI 中所示的最低分类的公司？

CLP 第 37(6) 条是否适用于拥有信息而有义务偏离附件 VI 中所示的最低分类的公司？

Does Article 37(6) of CLP apply to companies that possess information which obliges them to divert from the minimum classification indicated in Annex VI?

否，如果 CLP 附件 VI 表 3.1 中给出了最低分类，则无需根据 CLP 法规第 37(6) 条向成员国主管部门提交修改协调分类的提案以应用更严格的分类。对于某些危险类别，包括急性毒性和 STOT RE，CLP 附件 VI 表 3.1 给出了最低分类，并用星号表示。对于此类最低分类，当满足 CLP 附件 VI 第 1.2.1 节中描述的条件时，应使用更严重的分类（CLP 标准应用指南，第 1.1.10 节）。根据指南第 1.7.2.1 节，只有在没有其他危险信息时才应使用最低分类。因此，公司必须评估所有信息，并在适当时应用更严格的分类并记录决策依据。因此，采用更严格分类的公司已根据 CLP 附件 VI 第 3 部分中的协调分类对该物质进行了分类。

No, where a minimum classification is given in Table 3.1 of Annex VI to CLP there is no need to submit a proposal amending a harmonised classification to a Member State competent authority in accordance with Article 37(6) of the CLP Regulation in order to apply the more stringent classification.   For certain hazard classes, including acute toxicity and STOT RE, Table 3.1 of Annex VI to CLP gives a minimum classification, indicated with an asterisk. For such a minimum classification, a more severe classification shall be used when the conditions described in section 1.2.1 of Annex VI to CLP are fulfilled (Guidance on the application of CLP criteria, section 1.1.10). According to the Guidance, section 1.7.2.1, the minimum classification should only be used if no additional hazard information is available. Thus, a company must assess all information and apply a more stringent classification if appropriate and record the decision basis. A company applying a more stringent classification has therefore classified the substance in agreement with the harmonised classification in Part 3 of Annex VI to CLP.