新产品上线! Email验证工具 - 限时免费试用中立即试用

外贸营销群发邮件之前,先批量验证邮箱地址是否有效,可节省成本,提高发送成功率,减少被列入黑名单风险。 更多需求:邮箱采集/邮件群发

混合物中物质的授权要求豁免(REACH 第 56(6)b 条)是否取决于其在任何危险类别中的分类,还是仅取决于该物质被列入授权清单的危险类别?

问题(中文)
混合物中物质的授权要求豁免(REACH 第 56(6)b 条)是否取决于其在任何危险类别中的分类,还是仅取决于该物质被列入授权清单的危险类别?
Question (EN)
Does the exemption from the authorisation requirement for substances in mixtures (Article 56(6)b of REACH) depend on their classification in any hazard class or only the hazard classes for which the substance was included in the authorisation list?
中文内容由 Google Cloud Translation 自动生成,仅供参考;请以英文原文为准。问答资料来自欧盟化学品管理局(ECHA)官方网站。
答案(中文)
当 CMR 物质在混合物中的浓度低于 CLP 法规第 11(3) 条规定的浓度限值时,授权要求不适用于 CMR 物质的使用,这会导致混合物被归类为危险品(REACH 第 56(6)b 条)。只应考虑导致物质被列入授权清单的危险类别。这样做的基础是针对最受关注的内在属性,这是授权过程的目标。这反映在 REACH 的法律规定中:第 62(4) 条要求仅针对授权清单中给出的危险类别申请授权,第 60(2) 条将授权申请的评估限制在充分控制途径下授权清单中给出的危险类别。
Answer (EN)
The authorisation requirement does not apply to the use of CMR substances when they are present in mixtures below the concentration limits specified in Article 11(3) of the CLP Regulation, which result in the classification of the mixture as hazardous (Article 56(6)b of REACH). Only the hazard class (or hazard classes) which specifically led to inclusion of the substance in the authorisation list should be taken into account. The basis for this is to target the intrinsic properties of highest concern, which is the objective of the authorisation process. This is reflected in the legal provisions of REACH: Article 62(4), which requires an application for authorisation only for the hazard class given in the authorisation list, and Article 60(2), which limits the assessment of a request for authorisation to the hazard class given in the authorisation list under the adequate control route.