新产品上线! Email验证工具 - 限时免费试用中立即试用

外贸营销群发邮件之前,先批量验证邮箱地址是否有效,可节省成本,提高发送成功率,减少被列入黑名单风险。 更多需求:邮箱采集/邮件群发

制造商或进口商是否必须通知 CLP 附件 VI 中列出的物质?

问题(中文)
制造商或进口商是否必须通知 CLP 附件 VI 中列出的物质?
Question (EN)
Does a manufacturer or importer have to notify substances listed in Annex VI to CLP?
中文内容由 Google Cloud Translation 自动生成,仅供参考;请以英文原文为准。问答资料来自欧盟化学品管理局(ECHA)官方网站。
答案(中文)
是的,他必须这样做;如果将附件 VI 中列出的物质投放到欧盟市场,则必须根据 CLP 第 40 条进行通知。如果通过附件 VI 协调了特定的危险类别或区分,则在通知该物质时必须使用此分类。需要注意的是,对于附件 VI 中具有最低分类的物质,如果通知人有更多信息表明这样更合适,则必须将其归类为更严重的危险类别(另见 QnA 260)。对于 CLP 附件 VI 中列出的非协调危险类别或区分物质,制造商或进口商应根据 CLP 第 4(3) 条对物质进行自行分类,并在其向 C&L 清单提交的通知中提供最终的分类和标签。如果他得出结论认为该物质不应归类为这些危险类别或区分,则应根据 CLP 第 40(1)(d) 条说明理由。如果通知人提议对某种物质采用与其他参与者已提交给清单的物质不同的非协调分类和标签,则通知人必须在向清单通知时提供其分类的理由。
Answer (EN)
Yes, he does; substances listed in Annex VI have to be notified in accordance with CLP Article 40 if placed on the EU market. Where a particular hazard class or differentiation is harmonised through Annex VI, this classification has to be used when notifying the substance. It is noted that for substances with a minimum classification in Annex VI, the notifier must classify in a more severe hazard category where he has further information which shows that this is more appropriate (see also QnA 260). For non-harmonised hazard classes or differentiations of substances listed in Annex VI to CLP, the manufacturer or importer should self-classify the substance and introduce the resulting classification and labelling in his notification to the C&L Inventory, according to Article 4(3) of CLP. In case he concludes that the substance should not be classified for these hazard classes or differentiations, the reason should be given in accordance with Article 40 (1) (d) of CLP. Where a notifier proposes to apply a different non-harmonised classification and labelling for a substance than that which has already been submitted to the Inventory by another actor, the notifier has to provide a reason for his classification as part of his notification to the Inventory.